About your Search

20130801
20130831
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2 (some duplicates have been removed)
address, explain your conduct for us. if they believe and reasonably suspect they're in physical danger, they can then frisk the person, and they can get the weapon or anything that could harm them, they hold it, they continue the questioning, then they either give it back to the person or they arrest them. >> here is the problem. that all sounds like it's a great way to reduce crime until you start to break down the nmen numbers and it turns out nine out of ten people who were stopped and afrifrisked under t policy were african-american or hispanic. and isn't that where the judge said you can't isolate like this. >> this particular case was four minority individuals that believe they were stopped, questioned, and frisked because of racially who they were, and so what the judge is saying, she's not abolishing this, she's saying let's have a monitor here to really monitor internal policy changes. so we're going to have to see how this evolves in real life, but it's quite a ruling. >> so i did not sit through all nine weeks but i wish i had because the new york city police had a very good
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2 (some duplicates have been removed)

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)